Point: When a colleague claims not to share the same understanding of points confirmed in last week’s meeting, it necessitates resolution. Reason: Leaving such discrepancies unresolved can lead to confusion in project progress and compromise team efficiency. Example: If, for instance, it’s believed that responsibilities for certain tasks and deadlines were clarified in the last meeting, but a colleague expresses a differing understanding, it could lead to issues such as task duplication or missed deadlines.
Point: Clear communication is essential to resolving differences in understanding. Reason: Through communication, misunderstandings can be clarified and correct information can be shared, thus resolving differences in understanding. Example: Direct dialogue with the colleague to revisit discussions and decisions made in last week’s meeting can help understand where the discrepancies arose and establish a common understanding.
Point: Resolving differences in understanding requires fairness and respect. Reason: By treating others fairly and respectfully, trust can be built, facilitating smooth cooperation. Example: Understanding and respecting the colleague’s perspective while addressing differences can lead to problem resolution without compromising the working relationship.
入会申込
ログイン
